Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Category 16 of 22

Video conferencing

In short

Video conferencing platforms process live audio, video, and chat communications, often storing recordings and transcripts. For EU buyers, the key criterion is operator jurisdiction: US-owned platforms process meeting content and metadata that falls within CLOUD Act reach. Top-rated EU options on EU Vetted include Tixeo (France, 5/5), Element/Matrix (UK, 5/5), Wire (Switzerland, 5/5), and Threema (Switzerland, 5/5).

Video conferencing platforms power some of the most sensitive business communications: board strategy sessions, legal discussions, medical consultations, HR conversations, and client negotiations. Beyond live audio and video, most platforms retain meeting recordings, transcripts, participant lists, and metadata such as who joined when and from where. This combination of real-time sensitive content and retained records makes operator jurisdiction particularly important in an EU context.

If the platform is a US-incorporated company or belongs to a US corporate group, the CLOUD Act can in principle apply to recordings and metadata regardless of where they are stored. EU-owned operators such as Tixeo (France, 5/5) and sipgate (Germany, 5/5) are not subject to that direct exposure. Swiss-based platforms Wire (5/5) and Threema (5/5) operate under Swiss law; Element (5/5), incorporated in the UK, builds on the open Matrix protocol where a self-hosted deployment removes third-party exposure entirely. Norwegian operators Pexip (4/5) and Whereby (4/5) are EEA-based and subject to GDPR, without the CLOUD Act exposure that comes with US corporate structure.

The listings below show each product's country of incorporation, ownership signal, hosting region, and EU Vetted's editorial compliance score on a 1–5 scale. Use the filters to separate general-purpose meeting tools from specialist secure-communication platforms, or to narrow by deployment model if on-premises installation is a requirement.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the best EU-hosted video conferencing platform?
On EU Vetted's editorial compliance score, Tixeo (France), Element (UK/Matrix protocol), Wire (Switzerland), and Threema (Switzerland) all reach 5/5, with sipgate (Germany) also at 5/5 for VoIP and telephony infrastructure. For corporate video meetings specifically, Tixeo is the most focused option — it is an EU-owned, ANSSI-qualified video conferencing system designed for sensitive environments. Pexip (Norway) and Whereby (Norway) both reach 4/5 as non-EU but non-US European alternatives.
Is there a GDPR-compliant video conferencing solution?
Any video platform operated by an EU-incorporated company with EU-only infrastructure and a published DPA qualifies as GDPR-compliant in its processing role. Tixeo (France) publishes detailed security and privacy documentation and holds ANSSI qualification. Compliance is an assessment of practices, not a guarantee; for meetings involving sensitive personal data — patient records, legal proceedings, HR conversations — the platform's recording and transcript handling policy is especially important to verify.
Does video conferencing data fall under the US CLOUD Act?
Video conferencing platforms process some of the most sensitive business communications: board meetings, legal strategy discussions, M&A conversations, and HR interviews. If the platform is operated or ultimately owned by a US-incorporated company, the CLOUD Act can in principle compel it to produce recordings, transcripts, and meeting metadata regardless of storage location. EU-owned operators such as Tixeo (France) are not subject to that direct exposure. Swiss-based operators Wire and Threema operate under Swiss law and are not directly subject to the CLOUD Act through US corporate structure.
What is Matrix and why does Element appear in this category?
Matrix is an open, decentralised communication protocol; Element is the most widely used client application built on it. Element Matrix Services is incorporated in the UK and provides hosted Matrix servers, including video conferencing via the Jitsi integration. Because Matrix is an open federated protocol, organisations can also run their own Matrix homeserver and use Element as the client — removing any third-party operator. Element receives a 5/5 compliance score on EU Vetted's editorial assessment for its open architecture and EU-adjacent operation.
What is Tixeo and what makes it suitable for sensitive environments?
Tixeo is a French video conferencing platform that holds qualification from ANSSI, the French national cybersecurity agency, and has been approved for use by French and EU government entities handling sensitive information. It uses end-to-end encryption for video calls, meaning that neither the Tixeo operator nor any intermediary can decrypt the video or audio stream. It is rated 5/5 on EU Vetted's editorial compliance score, reflecting its EU ownership, EU hosting, and published security certifications. It offers both SaaS and on-premises deployment.
Can EU video conferencing replace Zoom or Microsoft Teams for a business?
For most standard business meeting use cases — scheduled calls, screen sharing, file sharing, breakout rooms — European alternatives such as Tixeo, Wire, Whereby, and Pexip cover the core functionality. Feature parity gaps tend to appear in deep integrations with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, AI-assisted transcription, and large-scale webinar modes. Whereby and Pexip are designed for easy browser-based access without client installation, which reduces friction for external participants.
Is Whereby or Pexip a safe choice despite not being EU-incorporated?
Whereby and Pexip are both incorporated in Norway, an EEA country that applies GDPR and is part of the European Economic Area but not an EU member state. Both receive a 4/5 compliance score on EU Vetted's editorial assessment, reflecting the non-EU but privacy-aligned regulatory environment. Norway is not subject to the CLOUD Act through its corporate structure, making Norwegian-incorporated companies a lower-risk choice than US-incorporated ones. Adequacy for EU data transfers to Norway applies through the EEA Agreement.