Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Category 05 of 24

Email aliasing

In short

Email aliasing generates disposable forwarding addresses so your real inbox is never handed to the services you sign up with. For EU buyers the deciding facts are the operator's jurisdiction, whether a named legal entity stands behind it, which sub-processors carry the forwarded mail, and whether you can self-host, because a US-incorporated operator falls under the CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act). The honest finding on EU Vetted is that there is no EU-incorporated commercial email-aliasing company. The four options listed are SimpleLogin (operated by Proton AG in Switzerland, CLOUD Act exposure: Minor), addy.io (governed by the law of England and Wales with no operator named, CLOUD Act exposure: Minor), AdGuard Mail (registered in Cyprus, forwarding routed through a US service, CLOUD Act exposure: Material), and AliasVault (the only EU-registered operator, a Dutch sole proprietorship, ownership: EU-owned, CLOUD Act exposure: None, but its aliases are receive-only).

About this category
About Email aliasing

Feature comparison

Beyond compliance: how these alternatives compare on the capabilities you actually use day to day.

Feature SimpleLogin addy.io AdGuard Mail AliasVault
Email aliases 10 aliases 10 aliases 10 aliases
Custom domain Yes Yes No No
Reply from alias Yes Yes Yes No
PGP-encrypted forwarding Yes Yes No No
Catch-all domain Yes Yes No No
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the best EU email-aliasing service?
There is no clean answer, and that is the point. AliasVault is the only EU-registered operator on this list (a Dutch sole proprietorship, ownership: EU-owned, hosted in Germany, CLOUD Act exposure: None), but its aliases are receive-only: you cannot reply from them. SimpleLogin is the most capable option and is operated by Proton AG in Switzerland (CLOUD Act exposure: Minor), with reply-from-alias, custom domains and PGP forwarding, but its operator is Swiss, not EU. If you need a named EU legal entity, AliasVault is the only match; if you need to reply from your aliases, SimpleLogin or a self-hosted instance is the practical starting point.
Why is there no European alternative to Firefox Relay or SimpleLogin?
Because the market never produced one. The mainstream aliasing services are American: Firefox Relay is operated by Mozilla, Apple Hide My Email by Apple, and DuckDuckGo Email Protection by DuckDuckGo, all US companies subject to the CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act). Among the credible challengers, none is an EU-incorporated commercial company. SimpleLogin is operated by Proton AG in Switzerland, addy.io is governed by the law of England and Wales and names no operating entity at all, and AdGuard Mail is registered in Cyprus by a company whose founding origin its own materials do not confirm. The single EU-registered operator, AliasVault, is a Dutch one-person sole proprietorship whose aliases are receive-only and which publishes no data-processing agreement. So the correct answer is not to pick a flag but to rank on jurisdiction, a named legal entity, the sub-processors that carry your mail, and whether you can self-host on EU infrastructure.
Does email-aliasing data fall under the US CLOUD Act?
If the aliasing service is operated or ultimately owned by a US-incorporated company, the CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act) can compel it to produce data it controls regardless of where the servers sit. That is the case for Firefox Relay, Apple Hide My Email and DuckDuckGo Email Protection. Among the options here, SimpleLogin (CLOUD Act exposure: Minor) and addy.io (CLOUD Act exposure: Minor) route only ancillary functions such as DNS and captcha through US sub-processors, while their forwarded mail stays on EU or Swiss infrastructure. AdGuard Mail (CLOUD Act exposure: Material) forwards mail through Amazon SES, a US-owned service, which is the product's core function rather than an ancillary one. AliasVault (CLOUD Act exposure: None) names no US sub-processor at all.
Can I reply from an alias?
It depends on the service, and it is the feature that most often separates them. SimpleLogin, addy.io and AdGuard Mail all support reply-from-alias on their paid tiers, so the recipient sees the alias rather than your real address. AliasVault does not: its aliases are receive-only, meaning you can receive mail at an alias but cannot send or reply from it, with a 10MB limit on incoming messages. If two-way use matters, confirm reply-from-alias support before choosing, because a receive-only alias breaks any workflow that needs a response from the same address.
Is there a GDPR-compliant email-aliasing service?
AliasVault is operated by an EU-registered entity (a Dutch sole proprietorship) and hosted in Germany, and its privacy policy states the cloud offering is compliant with the GDPR. That places its processing within the GDPR's scope. The caveat is documentation: AliasVault publishes no data-processing agreement and no sub-processors list, which is what holds it below a full compliance mark despite an otherwise clean profile. The same gap applies to addy.io and AdGuard Mail, neither of which publishes a DPA. GDPR scope is a legal fact; a published DPA and sub-processor register are the evidence a B2B buyer should ask for on top of it.
What about free, open-source aliasing services like Erine.email?
Erine.email is a live, free aliasing service released under the GPLv3, with active development (its most recent commit is dated 22 June 2026). It is deliberately not listed on EU Vetted, because it publishes no privacy policy, no data-processing agreement, and no operator country. A service can be free and open-source and still fall short of the bar a listing has to clear here, which is a stated jurisdiction and a minimum of published data-handling terms. Erine.email is worth knowing about as a working tool; it is not listed because there is not enough disclosed about who runs it and under which law to assess it.
Can I self-host email aliasing?
Yes, and it is a genuine answer in this category rather than a fallback. SimpleLogin, addy.io and AliasVault are all released under the AGPL-3.0 and are self-hostable via Docker. A self-hosted instance on EU infrastructure removes the hosting dependency and, for addy.io, also removes the unresolved-operator question entirely, because you become the data controller and processor and no third party sees your mail. The cost is that you run the mail server, the deliverability and the updates yourself. For a buyer who can carry that operational load, self-hosting is the cleanest sovereignty posture available here.
Why is AdGuard Mail's CLOUD Act exposure higher than SimpleLogin's?
Because of where the forwarded mail goes. AdGuard Mail (CLOUD Act exposure: Material) forwards mail through Amazon SES, a US-owned service, and forwarding is the product's core function, so the mail itself passes through US infrastructure. SimpleLogin (CLOUD Act exposure: Minor) keeps forwarded mail on Proton and UpCloud servers in the EU and Switzerland and uses US sub-processors only for ancillary tasks such as DNS and captcha. AdGuard Mail is operated by a Cyprus-registered company, AdGuard Software Ltd; widely cited secondary sources describe the company as founded in Moscow in 2009 and relocated to Cyprus around 2014, which AdGuard's own materials neither state nor deny. That origin is recorded here as reported by third parties and not confirmed by the vendor.