Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Curated collection

Project management without US sub-processors

European project-management tools verified to run with no US sub-processors — compared on ownership, hosting region, CLOUD Act exposure and sub-processor chain.

In short

The project-management tools listed here operate with no US sub-processors in the data path — an EU/EEA/Switzerland operator with no US parent and no US-incorporated processor. In project management the exposure usually re-enters through email, file storage or analytics sub-processors rather than the core app, which is why each listing records the full chain, not just the hosting region.

Last verified June 2026 DISCLOSURE Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.

Project management without US sub-processors, as listed on this page, means the operating company is incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, holds no US parent in its ownership chain, and routes no task or project data through a US-incorporated processor at any point in the stack. That is a chain of three facts — operator incorporation, ultimate ownership and the full sub-processor list — and all three must hold. A tool that is EU-hosted but owned by a US parent, or EU-owned but relying on a US-incorporated email relay or file-storage layer, does not clear the bar.

This page lists the project-management tools in our directory that meet this test, benchmarked on the criteria a buyer evaluates: hosting region, ownership signal, CLOUD Act exposure and the sub-processor chain. The distinction matters more in project management than in some other categories because the exposure rarely sits in the core scheduling or task engine; it re-enters through peripheral services. Every entry is sourced to the vendor's public sub-processor documentation and re-verified quarterly.

Why it matters

The CLOUD Act extends US government reach to data held by any company subject to US jurisdiction, regardless of where the servers physically sit. In project management, the core application is often EU-hosted and EU-owned, which can create a false sense of completeness. The exposure typically re-enters one level down: a US-incorporated transactional email service handling task notifications, an S3-compatible object-store layer routing file attachments through a US-owned processor, a product-analytics SDK phoning home to a US parent, or an AI-powered search layer built on a US foundation model API.

Each of those processors is separately reachable under the CLOUD Act, independently of where the primary application runs. This is why the directory records ownership and sub-processors as separate, evidenced signals rather than inferring one from the other. A clean ownership chain with a single overlooked US analytics SDK is still an exposure. Both must be clear for the "no US sub-processors" flag to apply, and that is what this page surfaces specifically for the project-management category.

How to choose

Start by matching the tool to your team size and integration requirements. For regulated buyers — public sector, legal, finance, healthcare — any US-incorporated processor in the chain is typically a veto regardless of contractual safeguards, because the CLOUD Act operates independently of contract terms. Open each profile, read the full sub-processor chain, and check the import path from your current tool before shortlisting.

For small teams and solo founders, price and developer experience are the binding constraints; look for EU-owned tools with a short, verifiable sub-processor list and a native importer for the tool you are leaving. For enterprise procurement, combine this page with the certification filters (BSI C5, SecNumCloud, EUCS) to narrow to products that satisfy both jurisdictional and security-audit requirements. Pay particular attention to the integration sub-processors each tool relies on — a PM tool's exposure often grows as you connect more services. Use the sort and filter controls on the listing above to narrow by hosting country, ownership or CLOUD Act exposure.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Where do US sub-processors usually hide in a project-management stack?
Rarely in the core app — more often in the notification email relay, the file-attachment storage, the search or AI layer, and product analytics. An EU-hosted PM tool can still route data through a US-incorporated processor in one of those layers, which is why we record each sub-processor separately.
What counts as 'no US sub-processors' on this page?
The operating company is EU/EEA/Swiss, has no US parent, and uses no US-incorporated sub-processor in the data path — the directory's 'CLOUD Act exposure: none' bar, verified against each vendor's public sub-processor list and ownership records.
Can I migrate from a US PM tool without losing data?
Usually yes. Most European PM tools import from the common US incumbents via CSV or native importers; the friction is in integrations and automation, not the task data. Check each profile for import paths and the integration sub-processors it relies on.
Is an EU-hosted PM tool automatically free of CLOUD Act exposure?
No. EU hosting addresses data location, not the operator's or a sub-processor's legal jurisdiction. A US parent or a US-incorporated processor in the chain keeps exposure even with EU servers. The exposure flag on each listing reflects the full chain.
How often is this re-verified?
Quarterly. Each listing carries its last-verified date, and a tool can move in or out of this list as its sub-processor chain changes.
Methodology

How we verified every listing here.

For each product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, certifications, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Read methodology →