Skip to content
EU VETTED

Project management without US sub-processors

European project-management tools verified to run with no US sub-processors, compared on ownership, hosting region, CLOUD Act exposure and sub-processor chain.

The project-management tools listed here operate with no US sub-processors in the data path: an EU/EEA/Switzerland operator with no US parent and no US-incorporated processor. In project management the exposure usually re-enters through email, file storage or analytics sub-processors rather than the core app, which is why each listing records the full chain, not just the hosting region.
EU Vetted Editorial
Verified June 2026 How we verify

Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.

Showing all 6 alternatives in this category

Source: EU Vetted dataset, 6 products, methodology v2026.05, as of Oct 2026.

About Project management without US sub-processors

Project management without US sub-processors, as listed on this page, means the operating company is incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, holds no US parent in its ownership chain, and routes no task or project data through a US-incorporated processor at any point in the stack. Three separate facts have to hold together (where the operator is incorporated, who ultimately owns it, and what the full sub-processor list contains), and any single gap breaks the claim. A tool that is EU-hosted but owned by a US parent, or EU-owned but relying on a US-incorporated email relay or file-storage layer, does not clear the bar.

This page lists the project-management tools in our directory that meet this test, benchmarked on the criteria a buyer evaluates: hosting region, ownership signal, CLOUD Act exposure and the sub-processor chain. The distinction matters more in project management than in some other categories because the exposure rarely sits in the core scheduling or task engine; it re-enters through peripheral services. We check each listing against the vendor's own sub-processor list and repeat the check quarterly.

Why it matters

US jurisdiction over a company follows it regardless of where its servers sit, which is the CLOUD Act mechanism in short. Project management is a category built around notification: every task assigned, comment posted or deadline moved typically fires an email, and every attached spec, screenshot or contract passes through a file layer separate from the task database itself. A core application can be genuinely EU-hosted and EU-owned while the transactional email service pushing those notifications, or the S3-compatible layer holding the attachments, sits with a US-incorporated processor, an AI-powered search or summarisation feature adds a third path through a US foundation-model API.

Each of those processors is separately reachable under the CLOUD Act, independently of where the primary application runs. A clean ownership chain with a single overlooked US notification or analytics vendor is still an exposure. Both the operator and every processor in the chain have to be clear for the "no US sub-processors" flag to apply, and that is what this page surfaces specifically for the project-management category, with the notification and attachment layers called out by name.

At a glance

Key facts per option, checked against each vendor's own documents.

  • factro

    hosted in Germany, encrypted at rest, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €19.99/mo.

    Best for: Project-management tool for German and DACH SMBs, public administration, and mid-market teams that want a German-hosted Asana/Monday/Trello alternative with a free-tier evaluation path.

  • kChat (Infomaniak)

    hosted in Switzerland, encrypted at rest, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €1.58/mo.

    Best for: Team messaging for Swiss and EU SMEs that want a Slack-style chat bundled with mail, storage and video from one Swiss provider, with a free plan to start.

  • SeaTable

    hosted in Germany, encrypted at rest, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €7/mo.

    Best for: No-code database and work-management tool for DACH and EU SMBs, non-profits, and public-sector teams that need an Airtable-class platform with German data residency and managed-cloud or on-premise deployment.

  • Stackfield

    hosted in Germany, zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €9/mo.

    Best for: Work and team-collaboration tool for German and DACH organisations replacing Slack, Teams, Asana or monday.com that need end-to-end encrypted rooms plus BSI C5 / ISO 27001 evidence for procurement.

  • Taiga

    hosted in Spain, encrypted at rest, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €5/mo.

    Best for: Open-source agile project-management tool for EU public-sector teams, universities, and open-source-aligned engineering teams that want a self-hostable Jira replacement under EU jurisdiction.

  • YetiForce

    hosted in Poland, encrypted at rest, no CLOUD Act exposure, from €80/mo.

    Best for: Open-source CRM and project-management tool for Polish, CEE, and EU SMBs and mid-market companies that want a self-hostable Salesforce alternative with deep customisation and broad language coverage.

How to choose

Start by matching the tool to your team size and integration requirements. For regulated buyers (public sector, legal, finance, healthcare), any US-incorporated processor in the chain is typically a veto regardless of contractual safeguards, because the CLOUD Act operates independently of contract terms. Open each profile, read the full sub-processor chain, and check the import path from your current tool before shortlisting.

For small teams and solo founders, what usually settles the decision is price and developer experience rather than the jurisdictional question; look for EU-owned tools with a short, verifiable sub-processor list and a native importer for the tool you are leaving. For enterprise procurement, layer the certification filters (BSI C5, SecNumCloud, EUCS) on top of this page to reach products clearing both the jurisdictional and the security-audit bar. Pay particular attention to the integration sub-processors each tool relies on: a PM tool's exposure tends to grow with every service you connect to it, notification email and attachment storage included. The filters above sort by hosting country, ownership or CLOUD Act exposure.

Switching from US project management?

Side-by-side European alternatives (same hosting, ownership and CLOUD Act checks) for the US tools most often replaced in this category.

Frequently asked questions

Where do US sub-processors usually hide in a project-management stack?
Rarely in the core app. More often in the notification email relay, the file-attachment storage, the search or AI layer, and product analytics. An EU-hosted PM tool can still route data through a US-incorporated processor in one of those layers, which is why we record each sub-processor separately.
What counts as 'no US sub-processors' on this page?
The operating company is EU/EEA/Swiss, has no US parent, and uses no US-incorporated sub-processor in the data path: the directory's 'CLOUD Act exposure: none' bar, verified against each vendor's public sub-processor list and ownership records.
Can I migrate from a US PM tool without losing data?
Usually yes. Most European PM tools import from the common US incumbents via CSV or native importers; the friction is in integrations and automation, not the task data. Check each profile for import paths and the integration sub-processors it relies on.
Is an EU-hosted PM tool automatically free of CLOUD Act exposure?
No. EU hosting addresses data location, not the operator's or a sub-processor's legal jurisdiction. A US parent or a US-incorporated processor in the chain keeps exposure even with EU servers. The exposure flag on each listing reflects the full chain.
How often is this re-verified?
Quarterly. Each listing carries its last-verified date, and a tool can move in or out of this list as its sub-processor chain changes.

How we verified every listing here

For each product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, certifications, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Read methodology