Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Curated collection

SecNumCloud-certified providers

European cloud and SaaS providers that hold (or are built to align with) ANSSI's SecNumCloud qualification, France's sovereign-cloud benchmark.

In short

SecNumCloud is ANSSI's sovereign-cloud qualification for France, covering both security controls and a corporate-structure requirement designed to limit non-EU extraterritorial legal reach. It is the reference standard in French public-sector cloud tenders and a shortlisting filter in regulated private-sector buys. OVHcloud and Oodrive hold formal qualifications; the list is short because the bar is high.

Last verified May 2026 DISCLOSURE Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.
Why it matters
How to choose
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is SecNumCloud?
SecNumCloud is a security qualification issued by ANSSI, France's national cybersecurity agency, for cloud service providers. Beyond technical and organisational security controls, the current 3.2 referential adds criteria intended to shield the service and its data from non-EU extraterritorial law, which is why it is treated as France's reference standard for sovereign cloud rather than a purely technical certification.
Is a SecNumCloud-qualified provider immune to the US CLOUD Act?
ANSSI's 3.2 criteria are designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial jurisdiction, for example by requiring that the operating entity and its decision-making sit within the EU and outside non-EU control. Whether that produces full legal immunity in a given case depends on the specific corporate structure and contracts, so we still record each provider's ownership and sub-processor chain separately rather than treating the qualification as a blanket guarantee.
Who actually needs SecNumCloud?
French public-sector bodies and operators handling sensitive or regulated data are the primary audience; the qualification is referenced in French government cloud doctrine and increasingly written into public tenders. Private buyers in regulated sectors (finance, health, defence supply chain) use it as a shortlisting filter even when it is not strictly mandatory.
Why are some listings 'SecNumCloud-aligned' rather than qualified?
The formal qualification is granted per service and takes time to obtain. Some providers operate infrastructure built to the referential, or have a qualification in progress, without the final visa yet. Where a vendor is not yet formally qualified we say so explicitly and link the source, so the distinction is never hidden.
How does SecNumCloud compare to BSI C5 and ISO 27001?
BSI C5 is Germany's cloud-security baseline, ISO 27001 is a broadly held international information-security standard, and SecNumCloud is France's sovereign-cloud qualification. All three address security controls, but SecNumCloud 3.2 adds a corporate-structure test (requiring EU ownership and decision-making) that BSI C5 and ISO 27001 do not. For pan-European procurement, EUCS is the emerging common framework; its higher assurance levels are expected to converge with SecNumCloud and BSI C5 requirements.
Is SecNumCloud recognised outside France?
Not formally as a mandatory requirement, but it is increasingly cited as a reference in European sovereignty discussions and is recognised by procurement teams in other EU member states as a meaningful signal. French public-sector cloud doctrine makes it a written requirement for certain data classifications; other European national schemes (BSI C5, EUCS) serve comparable purposes in their respective markets. If your tender spans multiple EU jurisdictions, check which national schemes are named alongside EUCS.
Methodology

How we verified every listing here.

For each product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, certifications, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Read methodology →