MIT-licensed proof-of-work CAPTCHA from Brno (BAU Software s.r.o.) with a public DPA and EU-only Cloud endpoints, though the Cloud itself runs on AWS.
- FROM
- —
- CLOUD ACT
- MATERIAL
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
Invisible proof-of-work form spam filter (Formspark team), free to 1,000 challenges a month, with a published sub-processor list that is mostly American and no legal entity named.
Botpoison, in the CAPTCHA & bot protection category, offers EU hosting with Ireland as its hosting location, but a US parent or sub-processor leaves material CLOUD Act exposure.
Botpoison is an invisible proof-of-work spam filter for forms, from the team behind Formspark, and it does the one thing most of this category refuses to do: it publishes a named sub-processor list on a public page. That list is also why the score is 2/5, because five names on it are Amazon Web Services (cloud infrastructure), Google Analytics, Sentry (error reporting), Stripe (payments) and Formspark, and the first four are US-incorporated: Material. The privacy policy states the products are operated from Belgium with data stored in Ireland, which puts the data in the EU under a US-owned operator. The bigger problem for a European buyer is that no legal entity is published anywhere: no company name, no registration number, no registered address, on a site selling to EU businesses that are themselves subject to imprint obligations. Country is recorded as Belgium purely on the vendor's own statement. There is no DPA either. Honest disclosure of an American stack is still worth more than silence, and it is why this is listed rather than skipped.
How exposed customer data is to US authorities under the CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act).
Where ultimate control over the operating company sits.
Botpoison is an invisible spam filter for web forms built on proof of work, from the team that also runs Formspark. There is no puzzle and nothing for the visitor to click: the browser computes a challenge in the background and the submission carries the result. It is deliberately small in scope, low-code, and aimed at contact forms and signup forms rather than at traffic-level bot filtering, with a free plan covering 1,000 challenges a month, then 2 USD for 5,000 and 7 USD for 50,000, unlimited installations on every tier.
It earns its place here for a reason that has nothing to do with the technology: Botpoison publishes its sub-processors by name on a public page, which puts it ahead of most of this category on transparency. Read the list, though, and the sovereignty picture is clear. The named processors are Amazon Web Services for cloud infrastructure, Formspark for customer support, Google Analytics for website analytics, Sentry for error reporting and Stripe for payments. Four of those five are US-incorporated, and AWS and Sentry sit in the operational path rather than in billing. The privacy policy states that the products and web properties are operated from Belgium and that information is transferred to and stored in Ireland, so the data is in the EU while the infrastructure operator is American: Material. Live infrastructure is consistent, with the site served from Amazon S3 behind CloudFront and corporate mail on Google Workspace.
The gap that matters most for a European buyer is not on the list at all. No legal entity is published anywhere on the site: no company name, no registration number and no registered address appear in the terms, the privacy policy or a legal notice, only the trading name and a copyright line. For a service sold to EU businesses, which are themselves subject to imprint requirements, that is a meaningful omission, and it is why the country recorded here rests entirely on the vendor's own sentence about operating from Belgium. There is no DPA either. Best fit: small sites and indie developers who want a free, invisible spam filter and are not making a sovereignty decision. Teams that are should look at the self-hosted or named-chain options in this category first.
Cloud infrastructure (data stated by the vendor as stored in Ireland)
Corporate and support email (from public MX records, not on the vendor's list)
Website analytics
Error reporting
Payment processing
Customer support (sibling product of the same team; listed separately in our forms-surveys category)
| Vendor | Country | Purpose | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services (AWS) | United States | Cloud infrastructure (data stated by the vendor as stored in Ireland) | US |
| Google Ireland Limited (Google Workspace) | Ireland | Corporate and support email (from public MX records, not on the vendor's list) | US |
| Google LLC (Google Analytics) | United States | Website analytics | US |
| Sentry | United States | Error reporting | US |
| Stripe, Inc. | United States | Payment processing | US |
| Formspark | Switzerland | Customer support (sibling product of the same team; listed separately in our forms-surveys category) | EU |
MIT-licensed proof-of-work CAPTCHA from Brno (BAU Software s.r.o.) with a public DPA and EU-only Cloud endpoints, though the Cloud itself runs on AWS.
Vienna CAPTCHA (Captcha GmbH, part of the Krone Multimedia group) with named processors, from 8.90 EUR/month, but the site itself runs on AWS CloudFront and Google analytics.
Munich-area CAPTCHA (Scoria Labs GmbH) with a published two-name sub-processor chain for the widget: Hetzner and bunny.net, both EU, from 15 EUR/month.