Skip to content
EU VETTED

Asana vs Stackfield

How Stackfield, a European Project management tool, compares with Asana on the signals a privacy-conscious buyer actually checks: who owns it, where it hosts, and its exposure to the US CLOUD Act.

Stackfield (Germany, Munich, EU-owned, EU-hosted, CLOUD Act exposure: None, with end-to-end encrypted rooms) is one of the cleanest European answers to Asana for a sovereignty-focused buyer. Asana is a US-incorporated public company (NYSE: ASAN) on US infrastructure with direct CLOUD Act exposure. Stackfield inverts that profile entirely: a German company, German hosting, no identified CLOUD Act exposure, and E2E encryption of tasks, chat and files in rooms created as encrypted. The trade-off is ecosystem size (Asana has a larger integration marketplace and a more polished UI), but on jurisdiction this is about as clear as the comparison gets.

Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.

Asana vs Stackfield, on the sovereignty signals

Compliance and pricing facts, side by side. The right column is pulled live from our verified dataset; the left reflects the incumbent’s public profile.

Asana vs Stackfield, on the sovereignty signals
Signal Asana Stackfield
Ownership US-owned
Hosting region US Germany
CLOUD Act exposure Direct None
Sovereignty US-Linked EU-Sovereign
Certifications None listed
ISO/IEC 27001 BSI C5 ISO/IEC 27017 ISO/IEC 27018
Price from Free / from $10.99/user/mo from €9/mobilled annually
Visit Stackfield Read the Stackfield profile

Asana vs Stackfield: which should you pick?

If data sovereignty is non-negotiable for you, Stackfield is one of the clearest answers to Asana available. The comparison is unusually one-sided on jurisdiction. Asana is a US public company (NYSE: ASAN) on US infrastructure with direct CLOUD Act exposure. Stackfield (Munich, EU-owned, EU-hosted, CLOUD Act exposure: None) inverts every signal: German ownership, German hosting, no identified exposure, and end-to-end encryption of tasks, chat and files in encrypted rooms, rare in project management.

The real trade-off is ecosystem, not compliance. Asana brings a larger integration marketplace, richer reporting views, and a more polished UI. Stackfield delivers the core work-management toolkit in a tighter, security-first package.

Pick Asana if a long tail of integrations or advanced portfolio reporting is essential. Pick Stackfield if EU jurisdiction, German hosting, and end-to-end encryption are the point, especially for legal, healthcare, or public-sector teams where project-content confidentiality is a compliance requirement.

Migrating from Asana to Stackfield

Asana-to-Stackfield is a structured rebuild rather than a one-click import; budget a focused afternoon per active project.

  1. Export your Asana projects. Use Asana's CSV export per project to capture tasks, assignees, due dates, sections, and custom fields. This is your source of truth for the rebuild.
  2. Recreate the project structure in Stackfield. Set up the matching rooms and task lists (decide per room whether it is end-to-end encrypted, since that cannot be changed later), then import tasks where the CSV maps cleanly. Treat the migration as a prune. Dormant projects rarely need to move.
  3. Rebuild custom fields and automations. Recreate custom fields and any rule-based automations natively in Stackfield; these do not transfer through a CSV.
  4. Onboard the team and run in parallel briefly. Get everyone into Stackfield, keep Asana read-only for a couple of weeks as a reference, then archive it once active work has fully moved.

Asana vs Stackfield: frequently asked questions

Why is Stackfield considered more sovereign than Asana?
On every structural signal. Stackfield is a German company (Munich), hosts customer data in Germany, and carries CLOUD Act exposure: None, with end-to-end encryption applied to tasks, messages and files in rooms created as encrypted. Asana is a US-incorporated public company (NYSE: ASAN) running on US infrastructure, which means direct CLOUD Act exposure regardless of data location. For a buyer who ranks data sovereignty above everything else, the two sit at opposite ends of the spectrum.
Does Stackfield really offer end-to-end encryption for project management?
Yes, which is unusual in this category, with one design choice to know before you migrate: encryption is set per room when the room is created (an admin can make it the organisation default), and an existing room cannot be switched over later. In an encrypted room, tasks, chat messages, files, pages and whiteboards are encrypted with AES-256 and RSA-2048 in the browser, so the provider cannot read that project data. 1:1 calls are end-to-end encrypted too; group conferences are transport-encrypted via Stackfield's own server. Combined with German hosting and German ownership, that makes it a strong fit for regulated sectors (legal, healthcare, public administration) where confidentiality of project content is a compliance requirement, not a nice-to-have.
Does Asana fall under the US CLOUD Act?
Yes. Asana, Inc. is a US-incorporated public company (NYSE: ASAN), so it falls within the reach of the US CLOUD Act regardless of where customer data is stored. Asana offers an SCC-based DPA and EU data hosting options, so it is legally usable from the EU; the alternative search is about removing the underlying US-jurisdiction exposure that a Schrems II assessment must document.
Can I migrate my Asana projects to Stackfield?
There is no native one-click Asana importer, so migration is a structured rebuild. Export your Asana projects to CSV (tasks, assignees, due dates, sections) and recreate the project structure in Stackfield, importing tasks where the CSV format allows. Most teams use a migration as a chance to prune dormant projects. Plan to rebuild automations and recreate any custom fields manually.
Is Stackfield cheaper than Asana?
Stackfield's paid plans start at €9 per user, which is competitive with Asana's paid tiers. The comparison usually favours Stackfield once you factor in that encryption and EU hosting are included rather than enterprise add-ons. Asana has a free tier for small teams; Stackfield is paid-first but priced for SMBs. For a sovereignty-driven SMB, the total cost of a compliant setup is typically lower with Stackfield.
What do I give up moving from Asana to Stackfield?
Mainly ecosystem breadth and UI polish. Asana has a larger third-party integration marketplace, Goals/OKR tracking, and a highly refined interface. Stackfield covers the core (lists, Kanban, Gantt, portfolios, chat, files, calls and reports) in a tighter, security-first package. If your workflows depend on a long tail of Asana integrations, audit those first; if they don't, Stackfield's sovereignty and encryption are a strong trade.

Related comparisons

All Asana alternatives See the full European shortlist, ranked Google Forms vs Tally Head-to-head comparison Dropbox vs Nextcloud Head-to-head comparison Google Analytics 4 vs Matomo Head-to-head comparison Typeform vs Tally Head-to-head comparison Mailchimp vs Brevo Head-to-head comparison Calendly vs Doodle Head-to-head comparison Slack vs Element (Matrix) Head-to-head comparison Discord vs Element (Matrix) Head-to-head comparison DocuSign vs Youtrust Head-to-head comparison Zendesk vs Crisp Head-to-head comparison Notion vs Anytype Head-to-head comparison Confluence vs Nuclino Head-to-head comparison HubSpot vs centralstationCRM Head-to-head comparison LastPass vs Proton Pass Head-to-head comparison 1Password vs Proton Pass Head-to-head comparison Google Drive vs Proton Drive Head-to-head comparison Microsoft OneDrive vs Tresorit Head-to-head comparison Apple iCloud vs kDrive (Infomaniak) Head-to-head comparison NordVPN vs Proton VPN Head-to-head comparison ExpressVPN vs Proton VPN Head-to-head comparison Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN Head-to-head comparison NordVPN vs Mullvad VPN Head-to-head comparison

How we verified each row above

For every product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Reviewed by the EU Vetted editorial team · Editorial guidelines

Last verified October 2026

Read methodology