Norwegian browser-based WebRTC video (ex-appear.in, Videonor-owned), no-install meetings + Embedded SDK; ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA.
- FROM
- —
- CLOUD ACT
- MINOR
US-incorporated video conferencing leader, NASDAQ-listed (ZM).
Tixeo (France, Montpellier, CLOUD Act exposure: None) and sipgate (Germany, Düsseldorf, CLOUD Act exposure: None) are the strongest European alternatives to Zoom on EU Vetted's editorial assessment. Both are EU-owned and EU-hosted. Tixeo is SecNumCloud-qualified with end-to-end encryption as the default; sipgate bundles video, voice, and PBX for DACH teams. Whereby (Norway) and Pexip (Norway) are both EU-hosted with public DPAs, though neither is EU-owned.
DISCLOSURE Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.
Ordered by feature parity and migration friction, which is weighted higher than feature breadth.
Norwegian browser-based WebRTC video (ex-appear.in, Videonor-owned), no-install meetings + Embedded SDK; ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA.
Montpellier-based French secure video conferencing (founded 2003), ANSSI CSPN-certified, SecNumCloud-qualified, defense + government grade.
Düsseldorf-based German VoIP + cloud-telephony operator (founded 2004, self-financed), 130 employees, all-German infrastructure.
All 5 alternatives, benchmarked against Zoom.
Norwegian browser-based WebRTC video (ex-appear.in, Videonor-owned), no-install meetings + Embedded SDK; ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA.
Montpellier-based French secure video conferencing (founded 2003), ANSSI CSPN-certified, SecNumCloud-qualified, defense + government grade.
Düsseldorf-based German VoIP + cloud-telephony operator (founded 2004, self-financed), 130 employees, all-German infrastructure.
Norwegian Euronext-listed (Oslo Børs) video collaboration platform, defense + government grade; self-host or hyperscaler-cloud-of-choice.
Free Swiss browser-based video meetings (Infomaniak, Geneva, since 1994); no guest account, own Swiss DCs, ISO 27001, no CLOUD Act.
| Product | Hosting | Sovereignty | Cert. | Pricing | Signals | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Zoom
benchmark · US
|
— |
US-LINKED | SOC 2 no EU framework |
Freemium |
E2E
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
|
|
Norwegian browser-based WebRTC video (ex-appear.in, Videonor-owned), no-install meetings + Embedded SDK; ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA.
|
IE
Ireland
|
SOVEREIGNTY
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
|
ISO/IEC 27001
|
Freemium |
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
→ |
|
Montpellier-based French secure video conferencing (founded 2003), ANSSI CSPN-certified, SecNumCloud-qualified, defense + government grade.
|
MONTPELLIER · FR
France
|
SOVEREIGNTY
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
|
SecNumCloud
|
Paid |
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
→ |
|
Düsseldorf-based German VoIP + cloud-telephony operator (founded 2004, self-financed), 130 employees, all-German infrastructure.
|
DÜSSELDORF · DE
Germany
|
SOVEREIGNTY
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
|
— | Paid |
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
→ |
|
Norwegian Euronext-listed (Oslo Børs) video collaboration platform, defense + government grade; self-host or hyperscaler-cloud-of-choice.
|
—
Norway
|
SOVEREIGNTY
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
|
— | Paid |
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
→ |
|
Free Swiss browser-based video meetings (Infomaniak, Geneva, since 1994); no guest account, own Swiss DCs, ISO 27001, no CLOUD Act.
|
GENEVA · CH
Switzerland
|
SOVEREIGNTY
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
|
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO9001
+2 more
|
Free |
Public DPA
Sub-processors
Open source
|
→ |
Beyond compliance: how these alternatives compare on the capabilities you actually use day to day.
| Feature | Whereby | Tixeo | sipgate | Pexip | kMeet (Infomaniak) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-hostable | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Max participants | 200 participants | 100 participants | |||
| Screen sharing | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Recording | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| End-to-end encryption | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Breakout rooms | Yes | No | |||
| Webinar mode | Yes | Yes | |||
| Browser join (no app) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.
Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.
US-incorporated video conferencing leader, NASDAQ-listed (ZM).
Where does the recording of a client call actually get processed and stored, and who could ultimately be compelled to hand it over? For a law firm, or any regulated organisation worried about evidentiary preservation and custody of meeting content, that question sits behind most conversations about moving off Zoom. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. is US-incorporated and publicly listed on NASDAQ as ZM; its sub-processors and primary infrastructure sit in the United States and fall under CLOUD Act jurisdiction. A German team running a Schrems II transfer impact assessment, or a French defence-adjacent organisation requiring SecNumCloud, arrives at the same question from a different angle.
This page maps the four European video-conferencing alternatives we have verified against Zoom by asking four concrete questions: who legally owns the company, where does the data physically sit, is meeting media end-to-end encrypted, and does the platform hold a recognised European compliance framework (ISO 27001, BSI C5, EUCS, SecNumCloud)? Every row is sourced to the vendor's public DPA.
Across these four, Tixeo is the strongest choice for SecNumCloud-required French buyers with E2E video as the default (France, Montpellier, EU-owned, SecNumCloud-qualified, CLOUD Act exposure: None), sipgate is the closest all-in-one DACH choice combining video, voice, and PBX (Germany, Düsseldorf, EU-owned, EU-hosted, CLOUD Act exposure: None), Whereby is the most consumer-friendly browser-based option for small teams (Norway, EU-hosted, public DPA), and Pexip is the enterprise pick for large-scale video infrastructure (Norway, EU-hosted, public DPA).
Daily meeting habits carry over largely intact once you move off Zoom:
What doesn't make the move:
Zoom migrations tend to break on forgotten calendar invites, not video quality; here is a five-step sequence that avoids that.
Match your situation to a starting point:
Which of those four constraints binds, SecNumCloud sovereignty, all-in-one voice+video consolidation, external-participant friction, or enterprise broadcast scale, is what should decide the pick; sort the table above by whichever one applies to you.
For every product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.
Reviewed by the EU Vetted editorial team · Editorial guidelines
Last verified May 2026