Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Alternatives to

European alternatives to Zoom.

US-incorporated video conferencing leader, NASDAQ-listed (ZM).

In short

Tixeo (France, Montpellier, CLOUD Act exposure: None) and sipgate (Germany, Düsseldorf, CLOUD Act exposure: None) are the strongest European alternatives to Zoom on EU Vetted's editorial assessment. Both are EU-owned and EU-hosted. Tixeo is SecNumCloud-qualified with end-to-end encryption as the default; sipgate bundles video, voice, and PBX for DACH teams. Whereby (Norway) and Pexip (Norway) are both EU-hosted with public DPAs, though neither is EU-owned.

ALTERNATIVES
5
CLOUD-ACT · NONE
3
WITH BSI C5
0
FREE TIER
2

DISCLOSURE   Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.

TOP PICKS

Which are the closest Zoom alternatives?

Ordered by feature parity and migration friction, which is weighted higher than feature breadth.

Whereby
Norway · Founded 2013
EU-BASED
★ #1 PICK

Norwegian browser-based WebRTC video (ex-appear.in, Videonor-owned), no-install meetings + Embedded SDK; ISO 27001 + GDPR + HIPAA.

Public DPA Sub-processors Open source
FROM
CLOUD ACT
MINOR
Tixeo
France · Founded 2003
EU-SOVEREIGN
★ #2 PICK

Montpellier-based French secure video conferencing (founded 2003), ANSSI CSPN-certified, SecNumCloud-qualified, defense + government grade.

Public DPA Sub-processors Open source
FROM
CLOUD ACT
NONE
sipgate
Germany · Founded 2004
EU-SOVEREIGN
★ #3 PICK

Düsseldorf-based German VoIP + cloud-telephony operator (founded 2004, self-financed), 130 employees, all-German infrastructure.

Public DPA Sub-processors Open source
FROM
CLOUD ACT
NONE
SIDE-BY-SIDE

How do the 5 European alternatives to Zoom compare?

All 5 alternatives, benchmarked against Zoom.

Feature comparison

Beyond compliance: how these alternatives compare on the capabilities you actually use day to day.

Feature Whereby Tixeo sipgate Pexip kMeet (Infomaniak)
Self-hostable No Yes No Yes No
Max participants 200 participants 100 participants
Screen sharing Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recording Yes Yes Yes Yes
End-to-end encryption No Yes Yes Yes
Breakout rooms Yes No
Webinar mode Yes Yes
Browser join (no app) Yes Yes Yes Yes
WHAT YOU'RE LEAVING
What are you leaving behind with Zoom?

Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.

Zoom US-incorporated

US-incorporated video conferencing leader, NASDAQ-listed (ZM).

US-based
OWNERSHIP
US-OWNED
CLOUD ACT
DIRECT
HOSTING
Likely AWS · US
SCHREMS II
Default SCC + supp.
Why switch

Why look for a Zoom alternative?

What you keep, what you give up

What do you keep, and what do you trade off?

Migration tips

How do you migrate from Zoom?

Picking the right one

Which Zoom alternative should you pick?

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Zoom usable under GDPR?
Zoom publishes a Data Processing Addendum based on the EU Standard Contractual Clauses with post-Schrems II supplementary measures, so it is legally usable from the EU. What still sends procurement teams looking at alternatives is the ownership and infrastructure sitting behind that DPA: Zoom Video Communications, Inc. is US-incorporated and publicly listed (NASDAQ: ZM), the platform runs on US cloud infrastructure with EU-region failover, and the parent corporate structure means CLOUD Act jurisdiction applies. For a transfer impact assessment, that combination is what prompts the alternative search.
Which Zoom alternative has the strongest compliance profile?
Among the alternatives mapped on this page, Tixeo (France, Montpellier) and sipgate (Germany, Düsseldorf) have the strongest signal set: both are EU-owned and EU-hosted (CLOUD Act exposure, Tixeo: None, sipgate: None). Tixeo holds SecNumCloud qualification (the French government's highest cloud-sovereignty certification), making it the default choice for French public sector and defence-adjacent buyers. sipgate combines video, voice, and PBX with documented German hosting. Whereby (Norway) and Pexip (Norway) are EU-hosted with public DPAs, but neither is EU-owned.
Can my Zoom meeting links transfer to the alternative?
No. Your Zoom meeting URLs are tied to Zoom's domain (zoom.us/j/xxxxx). After migration, you receive new meeting URLs on the new vendor's domain. The mitigation is to use your calendar invites as the canonical source of meeting links, not the Zoom URL itself. When the new tool is in place, future calendar invites carry the new URL; past invites continue to work because Zoom remains active during the parallel-running window.
Do the European alternatives support large webinars?
Pexip and Tixeo both handle webinars with hundreds of participants in their enterprise tiers; Pexip in particular is built around large-scale video infrastructure used by broadcast media and government. Whereby is positioned for small-group meetings rather than 500-attendee webinars; for a webinar-heavy workflow, Pexip is the most direct match for Zoom Webinars. sipgate's video product is meeting-shaped rather than webinar-shaped.
What about end-to-end encryption?
Tixeo ships with end-to-end encryption as the default, which is part of the SecNumCloud qualification it holds. Wire (listed separately under our Slack alternatives) also supports E2E video calls. Whereby and Pexip both support E2E for one-on-one and small-group meetings; for large meetings, the cryptographic model is transport-encryption rather than zero-knowledge end-to-end. Where E2E is a hard requirement, Tixeo is the clearest match.
Does Zoom fall under the US CLOUD Act?
In practice, yes. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. is US-incorporated, so the consolidated group (including any EU-region infrastructure) falls within the reach of the US CLOUD Act, which can compel a US company to produce data it controls regardless of where that data is stored. The EU-owned and EU-hosted alternatives on this page (Tixeo, sipgate) remove that direct exposure. This describes Zoom's corporate structure, not any actual request for meeting recordings or other data.
What is the cheapest European alternative to Zoom?
Whereby (Norway) offers the most accessible pricing among the European alternatives mapped here, with a free tier covering 1:1 meetings and paid plans starting at approximately €8.99/month per host for small-group calls. sipgate has a freemium model that becomes competitive for DACH teams bundling voice and video. Pexip and Tixeo are enterprise-priced; exact rates depend on participant volume and negotiated terms, so confirm current pricing directly with each vendor.
Is there a GDPR-compliant alternative to Zoom that is also browser-based?
Whereby (Norway, EU-hosted with a public DPA) is the strongest browser-based option: participants join in one click with no client install required, which is the primary friction-reducer for external customer calls. Pexip also supports a WebRTC browser join path for participants. Both publish DPAs based on EU Standard Contractual Clauses with EU-primary infrastructure. Tixeo and sipgate require client installation for full feature access.
Can a European video tool handle Zoom Rooms hardware?
Standard SIP/H.323 conference-room hardware works with Pexip and sipgate, both of which interoperate with room systems from Cisco, Poly, and Logitech. Specifically Zoom-Room-certified hardware needs reconfiguration; the Zoom Rooms firmware is not compatible with third-party video platforms. Tixeo supports on-premise deployments that can be integrated with SIP-capable room hardware. If hardware continuity is a binding constraint, audit your specific room-system models with the target vendor before committing to migration.
Which European alternative is best for French government or public-sector buyers?
Tixeo (France, Montpellier, EU-owned, EU-hosted, SecNumCloud-qualified) is the default answer for French public-sector and defence-adjacent buyers. It holds SecNumCloud qualification (the French government's highest cloud-sovereignty certification) and has been used by French ministries and several European defence contractors. End-to-end encryption is the default, and on-premise deployment is supported for classified or sensitive workloads. No other alternative mapped on this page holds SecNumCloud.
METHODOLOGY

How we verified each row above.

For every product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Reviewed by the EU Vetted editorial team · Editorial guidelines

Last verified May 2026

Read methodology →