Strictly necessary cookies (session, security) are always on. Analytics uses Pirsch (cookieless). With your consent, any advertising on the site can be personalised via cookies. Without consent, ads stay generic and untracked, but may still appear.
Read the privacy notice
Amazon Web Services. Excluded from EU sovereign cloud tender (April 2026).
Scaleway (France, Paris), Hetzner (Germany, Gunzenhausen), and OVHcloud (France, Roubaix) are the strongest European alternatives to AWS on EU Vetted's editorial assessment. All three are EU-owned, EU-hosted, and carry no material CLOUD Act exposure. Scaleway won part of the April 2026 €180M EU sovereign cloud tender. For lowest cost per vCPU, Hetzner leads. For SecNumCloud qualification required by French public sector, OVHcloud is the default.Read the full summary
Alternatives
20
CLOUD Act · none
14
Free tier
1
Disclosure:Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Editorial signals and rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.
Which are the closest AWS alternatives?
Ordered by feature parity and migration friction, which is weighted higher than feature breadth.
French sovereign cloud (Iliad-owned, Xavier Niel), HDS + ISO 27001 and on the ANSSI SecNumCloud qualification path; winner of €180M EU Cloud III tender.
Public DPA: YesSub-processors: YesOpen source: No
From
€2/mo
CLOUD Act
None
How do the 20 European alternatives to AWS compare?
French sovereign cloud (Iliad-owned, Xavier Niel), HDS + ISO 27001 and on the ANSSI SecNumCloud qualification path; winner of €180M EU Cloud III tender.
Public DPA: Yes
Sub-processors: Yes
Open source: No
Paris · FR
France
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignThis listingEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Dutch Kubernetes-native sovereign cloud (Thalassa Cloud Services B.V., Arnhem, 2024); 100% EU-owned, NL-hosted, API-first with an official Terraform provider. Early-stage, no published certifications yet.
Public DPA: No
Sub-processors: No
Open source: No
Arnhem · NL
Netherlands
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignThis listingEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Norwegian managed enterprise-cloud platform (est. 2000), own platform colocated in Oslo, NO/SE data residency, ISO 27001 + ISAE 3402/3000; enterprise quote-based, no public pricing.
Public DPA: No
Sub-processors: Yes
Open source: No
Oslo · NO
Norway
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedThis listingEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Dutch OpenStack public cloud (Cyso B.V., Alkmaar; formerly Fuga Cloud) on the operator's own hardware in Amsterdam and Frankfurt; ISO 27001 + NEN 7510, but no public DPA and a 2018 sub-processor list naming AWS, Microsoft and Google.
Public DPA: Not assessed
Sub-processors: Yes
Open source: No
Amsterdam · NL
Netherlands
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedThis listingEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
German budget VPS and dedicated-server host (netcup GmbH, Karlsruhe; part of Austria's founder-owned Anexia group since 2016); ISO 27001/27701; from €1.84/month.
Public DPA: Yes
Sub-processors: No
Open source: No
Nuremberg · DE
Germany
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedThis listingEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Finnish managed open-source data platform (PostgreSQL, Kafka, OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Valkey) on the cloud you choose; EU-owned, but the management plane runs on Google Cloud and most cloud options are US hyperscalers.
Public DPA: Yes
Sub-processors: Yes
Open source: No
BE
Belgium
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedThis listingEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Swiss Kubernetes-based public cloud (Hidora SA, Geneva): VMs, managed Kubernetes, GPUs, databases and S3 across three Swiss data centres; public DPA and ISO 27001, sub-processor list on request only.
Public DPA: Yes
Sub-processors: No
Open source: No
Geneva · CH
Switzerland
Sovereignty
A single roll-up of ownership and CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-SovereignThis listingEU/EEA/Switzerland-owned and -operated, with no identified CLOUD Act exposure.
EU-BasedEU-operated, with at most minor or transient US exposure.
EU-HostedEU hosting available, but a US parent or hyperscaler sub-processor creates material exposure.
US-LinkedOperated by a US-incorporated entity, directly subject to US jurisdiction.
Beyond compliance: how these alternatives compare on the capabilities you actually use day to day.
Table 2Capabilities by product
Feature
Hetzner
OVHcloud
Scaleway
UpCloud
IONOS
STACKIT
Cleura
Exoscale
T Cloud Public (formerly Open Telekom Cloud)
Stackscale
Contabo
Aruba Cloud
Thalassa Cloud
Intility
Clever Cloud
Infomaniak Public Cloud
Cyso Cloud
netcup
Aiven
Hikube
Dedicated / bare-metal
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Not assessed
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Object storage (S3)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Managed Kubernetes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Managed databases
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
GPU instances
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Hourly billing
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
API / Terraform
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Countries
4 countries
9 countries
3 countries
12 countries
5 countries
2 countries
2 countries
5 countries
2 countries
3 countries
7 countries
6 countries
1 countries
2 countries
8 countries
2 countries
2 countries
5 countries
100 countries
3 countries
Source: vendor documentation, as of Oct 2026.
What are you leaving behind with AWS?
What are you leaving behind with AWS?
Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.
Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.
US-based
AWSUS-incorporated
Amazon Web Services. Excluded from EU sovereign cloud tender (April 2026).
Ownership
US-owned
CLOUD Act
Direct
Why look for a AWS alternative?
A German procurement team writing a Schrems II transfer impact assessment, a French public-sector buyer requiring SecNumCloud, or a SaaS company mapping its dependencies ahead of the EU Tech Sovereignty Package all end up asking the same question about AWS: who actually controls this infrastructure? Amazon Web Services, Inc. is a subsidiary of the US-incorporated Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN), and despite multiple EU-region data centres and the announced European Sovereign Cloud, that ownership structure means CLOUD Act jurisdiction still applies. The April 2026 EU sovereign cloud tender (€180M, awarded to Scaleway, Clever Cloud, OVH, and STACKIT, with AWS excluded) is the clearest institutional signal that European buyers are already answering the question with alternatives.
This page checks twelve European cloud-hosting alternatives against AWS on four concrete questions: who legally owns the company, where the data physically sits, which sub-processors touch the operational layer, and whether the platform holds a recognised European compliance framework such as ISO 27001, BSI C5, EUCS, or SecNumCloud. The source for each answer is the vendor's published DPA.
The three names worth knowing up front are Scaleway (France, Paris; broadest managed-services catalogue, winner of part of the EU sovereign cloud tender), Hetzner (Germany, Gunzenhausen; strongest price-per-performance for compute-heavy workloads), and OVHcloud (France, Roubaix; the largest-scale European cloud, with SecNumCloud-qualified tiers for French public-sector buyers). All three are EU-owned and EU-hosted.
What do you keep, and what do you trade off?
Your compute, storage, and networking primitives survive the move largely untouched:
IaaS primitives (VMs, block storage, object storage, VPC networking, load balancers, managed databases). Every alternative has direct equivalents.
S3-compatible object storage with standard SDK compatibility.
Standard Linux and Windows VM images, with cloud-init support.
Terraform / OpenTofu and Pulumi support across all major European clouds.
IPv6, DDoS protection on most tiers, basic CDN options.
Where parity breaks down is breadth, not the core building blocks:
AWS's managed-services breadth at the AWS scale: ~250 AWS services, ~50–80 services on the larger European clouds. The breadth narrows on the lower-cost European clouds (Hetzner is famously minimal on managed services: compute, storage, network, and that's intentional).
AWS-specific products: DynamoDB (use a managed Postgres or Scaleway Document Database), Lambda's full runtime catalog (use Scaleway Functions, OVH Functions, or self-hosted OpenFaaS), SageMaker (Scaleway and OVH have ML-platform equivalents but smaller).
Some integrations with US-flavoured DevTools (AWS-specific CodePipeline, CloudFormation StackSets at extreme scale). Most teams use Terraform / OpenTofu instead, which works identically across all European clouds.
The AWS Marketplace's third-party software catalog. European clouds have smaller marketplaces; for niche enterprise software you may need direct vendor relationships rather than marketplace pull-in.
How do you migrate from AWS?
AWS-to-EU moves tend to follow the same seven stages regardless of which European cloud you pick.
Inventory your AWS service usage. Use AWS Cost Explorer to identify which services actually consume budget. Most SaaS workloads use 5–10 services for 90% of cost (EC2, S3, RDS, ELB, CloudFront, Route 53). The long tail is usually CloudWatch logs and forgotten test resources. Migrate the high-cost set; archive or terminate the long tail before moving.
Map AWS services to European equivalents. Build the mapping table explicitly: EC2 → Scaleway Instances / Hetzner Cloud / IONOS Compute, S3 → Scaleway Object Storage / OVH Object Storage, RDS → Scaleway Managed PostgreSQL / OVH Managed Databases, CloudFront → Scaleway Edge or BunnyCDN. For each AWS service in your inventory, pick the European target.
Re-create your VPC topology on the new cloud. Scaleway, OVH, Hetzner Cloud, IONOS, and STACKIT all support private networks with subnet routing equivalent to AWS VPCs. Replicate your subnet layout, security groups, and routing rules in code (Terraform/OpenTofu) before moving any data.
Set up data replication in both directions during the cutover. For databases, use logical replication (Postgres logical decoding, MySQL GTID-based replication) to stream data from AWS RDS to the new European managed database. For object storage, use rclone with s3-to-s3 mode to sync S3 buckets to the European S3-compatible service. Run both in parallel for 2–4 weeks to verify consistency before cutting over the application layer.
Cut over application traffic with DNS, not by changing application config. Use weighted DNS records (Route 53 or your DNS provider's equivalent) to shift traffic from the AWS endpoint to the European endpoint over a 7–14 day window. This lets you roll back quickly if something breaks. Most teams find one or two CloudFront-cached responses or Route 53 health checks that need adjustment during this window.
Migrate Lambda functions as containerised services. Lambda functions cannot be lifted into Scaleway Functions or OVH Functions without rework: different cold-start models, different event-source bindings. The pragmatic path is to containerise each Lambda as a small Docker image, deploy to your new Kubernetes cluster or to Scaleway Serverless Containers, and route via API gateway. Most Lambda code transfers with minor wrapper changes.
Keep AWS active for 90 days after the last service moves over. AWS migrations have a long tail of forgotten resources: an unused CloudWatch log group still being written to, a Lambda triggered by an SNS topic you forgot exists, an S3 bucket with an old data export. Pause the AWS account at zero spend, run AWS Cost Anomaly Detection on the residual, and only close the account after 90 days of clean reports.
Which AWS alternative should you pick?
Five profiles cover most of the AWS migrations we see; find the one closest to yours:
You are a SaaS founder or indie team running on AWS at $100–$2 000/month and want the lowest-cost EU production-grade alternative. Start with Hetzner (Germany, Gunzenhausen, EU-owned and EU-hosted). The price-per-vCPU and price-per-GB-storage benchmarks are well-documented as the best in the European cloud category. Best fit for compute-heavy SaaS, cron-job-heavy workloads, and teams comfortable running their own Postgres / Redis / load balancer. IONOS is a similar value choice with stronger SLA framing for paying enterprise tiers.
You are a modern SaaS engineering team that wants a managed-services catalog (managed K8s, managed Postgres, serverless functions) and EU-sovereign-cloud-tender credentials. Start with Scaleway (France, Paris, EU-owned and EU-hosted). Won part of the April 2026 €180M EU sovereign cloud tender; ships managed K8s, managed Postgres, S3-compatible object storage, serverless containers, and a clean developer UX. Best fit for SaaS teams that want AWS-like ergonomics with EU ownership.
You are a French organisation, public-sector, or regulated industry that requires SecNumCloud qualification on the contract. Start with OVHcloud (France, Roubaix, EU-owned and EU-hosted). The largest-scale European cloud with SecNumCloud-qualified tiers ("Sovereign Cloud" range) and a public-sector procurement track record. Best fit for large-scale enterprise workloads needing French sovereign cloud qualification.
You are a DACH enterprise that needs C5-aligned hosting with strong banking and public-sector references. Start with STACKIT (Germany, Neckarsulm, EU-owned and EU-hosted) or T Cloud Public from Deutsche Telekom (Germany, Biere, EU-owned and EU-hosted). STACKIT is the Schwarz Group / Lidl cloud and also won part of the April 2026 sovereign tender. T Cloud Public has Deutsche Telekom's enterprise track record.
You are a Spanish, Italian, or Nordic team that wants regional cloud locality and a vendor headquartered in your home market. Start with Stackscale (Spain, Madrid, EU-owned and EU-hosted), Aruba Cloud (Italy, Arezzo, EU-owned and EU-hosted), UpCloud (Finland, Helsinki, EU-owned and EU-hosted), or Cleura (Sweden, EU-owned and EU-hosted). All four have the regional language, time-zone, and procurement-onboarding advantages for their home markets.
There is no single winner: which of these fits depends on whether lowest cost, modern managed-services catalog, SecNumCloud qualification, enterprise SLA framing, or regional vendor locality is the constraint you can't compromise on. Sort the comparison table above by whichever of those five applies to you.
AWS publishes a Data Processing Addendum based on the EU Standard Contractual Clauses with post-Schrems II supplementary measures, offers EU region residency (Frankfurt, Paris, Dublin, Stockholm, Milan, Zurich, Spain), and provides a European Sovereign Cloud option. The service is legally usable from the EU. What GDPR compliance does not resolve is ownership: Amazon Web Services, Inc. is US-incorporated and a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc., so CLOUD Act jurisdiction applies to the parent group regardless of which AWS region stores the data. That gap is why AWS was excluded from the €180M EU sovereign cloud tender in April 2026, awarded instead to Scaleway, Clever Cloud, OVH, and STACKIT, a procurement-policy signal separate from any single technical compliance argument.
Which AWS alternative has the strongest compliance profile?
This is the strongest category on the site. Ten of the twelve alternatives mapped here are EU-owned, EU-hosted, and carry no material CLOUD Act exposure: Scaleway (France, Paris), Hetzner (Germany, Gunzenhausen), OVHcloud (France, Roubaix), UpCloud (Finland, Helsinki), IONOS (Germany, Frankfurt), STACKIT (Germany, Neckarsulm), Cleura (Sweden), Stackscale (Spain, Madrid), Aruba Cloud (Italy, Arezzo), and T Cloud Public from Deutsche Telekom (Germany, Biere). Exoscale (Switzerland) is EU-hosted with a minor CLOUD Act exposure due to its Swiss domicile. Contabo is EU-hosted but has a broader sub-processor footprint and lacks a fully disclosed sub-processor list.
Can a European cloud replace AWS for a production SaaS workload?
Yes for the majority of workloads. For straightforward compute, storage, and networking (the AWS EC2/S3/VPC trio that powers most SaaS), Scaleway, Hetzner, OVH, IONOS, and STACKIT all have direct equivalents. European clouds still have narrower coverage in a few managed services: AWS-specific products like DynamoDB, Lambda's broadest runtime catalog, and SageMaker have partial European equivalents but with smaller ecosystems. For 80–90% of SaaS hosting workloads, the European clouds are production-ready today.
What about Kubernetes?
Scaleway, OVH, IONOS, STACKIT, Exoscale, and UpCloud all offer managed Kubernetes services. The compatibility with kubectl, Helm, and standard CNCF tooling is identical to AWS EKS, so your manifests do not need rewriting. The differences are in node-pool pricing models and the specific cloud-controller-manager integrations. For most teams, the Kubernetes migration is one of the easier parts of an AWS-to-EU move.
What about S3-compatible object storage?
Every European cloud listed here ships an S3-compatible object storage product. The compatibility is generally 95%+ for standard SDK operations (get, put, list, delete, multipart upload). Some AWS-specific features (Intelligent-Tiering automatic class transitions, S3 Object Lambda, Vault Lock) are not implemented. For backup and archive workloads, Scaleway Glacier, OVH Cold Archive, and IONOS S3 Cold are all viable replacements for S3 Glacier.
Does AWS fall under the US CLOUD Act?
Yes. Amazon Web Services, Inc. is a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc., which is US-incorporated. The consolidated group (including AWS's EU-region data centres in Frankfurt, Paris, Dublin, and elsewhere) falls within the reach of the US CLOUD Act, which can compel a US company to produce data it controls regardless of where that data is stored. The April 2026 EU sovereign cloud tender (€180M) explicitly excluded AWS for this reason, awarding the contract to Scaleway, Clever Cloud, OVH, and STACKIT. The ten EU-owned, EU-hosted alternatives on this page carry no material CLOUD Act exposure, removing that direct risk. That conclusion follows from group ownership alone, not from any known or suspected data request against AWS.
Can a European cloud handle a high-traffic SaaS at enterprise scale?
Yes. Scaleway, OVH, and IONOS all operate multi-region infrastructure with the capacity and SLA framing for enterprise SaaS workloads. OVHcloud is the largest European cloud by server count and operates datacentres across Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific. Scaleway powers multiple publicly-known SaaS products at scale. Hetzner is production-ready for compute-heavy workloads but intentionally minimal on managed-services breadth; teams needing a managed services catalog at enterprise depth should prefer Scaleway or OVH.
Is there a GDPR-compliant alternative to AWS?
All twelve European alternatives mapped on this page are GDPR-compliant by design: EU-headquartered, EU-hosted, published DPAs based on SCCs. The ten that are EU-owned and EU-hosted with no material CLOUD Act exposure meet the stronger bar that regulated-industry and public-sector buyers typically require. For organisations subject to French public-sector procurement rules, OVHcloud's SecNumCloud-qualified tiers are the highest available certification in the European cloud market.
Can a European cloud alternative support serverless and managed database workloads?
Yes, for the majority of use cases. Scaleway offers serverless containers, serverless functions, managed PostgreSQL, managed MySQL, and a document database equivalent to DynamoDB in common patterns. OVH offers managed databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kafka, Cassandra, Redis) and managed Kubernetes. IONOS and STACKIT offer managed Kubernetes and managed databases. The European managed-services catalog is smaller than AWS's ~250 services, but the services covering 80–90% of SaaS workloads are available today.
Related European alternatives
AWS sits in Cloud & hosting. Compare neighbouring tools with the same hosting, ownership and CLOUD Act checks.
For every product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Signals are editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.